Tuesday, January 07, 2014

Do Car Insurance Companies Take Advantage of Good Drivers?

The subject of car insurance companies and the payment of premiums continue to draw out debates on how companies benefit at the expense of their clients. Have you asked yourself this question; what happens when you buy car insurance coverage and you don't cause an accident in the entire lifetime? The answer to this question is as perturbing as to the lack of knowledge as to when you will cause or be involved in an accident.

A client remains in suspense of knowing when an accident will strike next. Although it is not within the desire of motorists to be involved in accidents, it is sometimes a bother to the insured when they pay insurance coverage only to remain uncompensated for injuries or damage to a vehicle due to good driving ethics.


Whether it's a good luck or simply an act of observing good driving ethics, the implication is that car insurance companies benefit at the expense of the insured when they do not cause accidents. Often the insurance companies have used the driving history as one of the main determinants of the insurance premium rates determinants.


Bad driving ethics characterized by subsequent accidents usually hike the premium rates and the insured bears the burden of bad driving practices. But then, what happens when an insured does not cause or is not involved in any way in accidents that warrant compensations?


As an appreciation of good driving ethics, insurance companies impose reduced rate of premiums to the insurance buyers. However, the company keeps attached to the assumption that the driver will at one time be involved in an accident thus has to keep on remitting their premiums. Nonetheless, the drivers keep on observing good driving behaviors and do not cause accidents that warrant compensations to be made. In this case the car insurance company benefits from these remittances and in fact there are no refunds that are made.


Insurance companies operate on a notion that, even if an insurance buyer is not compensated for any injuries or car damages, others are paid for the same. The success of the insurance company is based on the fact that only few drivers will cause accidents and claim for compensations. This is where the whole issue of car insurance payment becomes complex and often regarded as unfavorable for the drivers who observe an accident-free driving.


In fact some drivers have attempted to cause accidents so as to place a claim for compensation because they perceive that their good ethical driving practices as a benefit to the insurance company. Whether this is a justifiable act or not, the issue is that insurance companies should consider revising the way good drivers are rewarded for their good performance.


It is worthwhile mentioning that, car insurance companies and governments should get back to the drawing board and bring out a concise and clear answer to this heated debate. To grab the bull by its horns, insurance buyers feel betrayed by the insurance companies especially when they do not indulge in accidents that prompt the companies to reimburse compensations. The government must analyze this aspect and bring out a more customer oriented car insurance policy.


Auto insurance buyers who in most of their life time do not assume compensations of any nature during their driving history are dissatisfied by the way insurance companies use their premium contributions for their sole benefits. Aptly, there is a burning issue that needs to be resolved and this is; should insurance buyers receive a considerable amount of refund if they do not cause accidents or are not in any way compensated for personal body injuries or car damages within their driving experience?


No comments:

Post a Comment